Ready to start using EirePlan?
Create your account and start working in a planning-native workspace.
A planning-native workspace
585,000+ planning decisions and every active development plan across 32 local authorities. Structured, searchable, and backed by AI that cites its sources.
eireplan.ie
Every planning record. Structured and searchable.
Planning data across 32 council systems, indexed in one place. Precedents structured by reference, authority, type, decision, and location. Superseded policies flagged automatically.
0+
planning decisions indexed
32
Local authorities
Every
Development plan
Live
Policy tracking
ReferenceAddressDecision
D26B/0051Elsinore, Corrig Avenue, Dun LaoghaireGrant
2660076Gortlandroe, Nenagh, Co. TipperaryGrant
SD26B/0027W10 Glenlyon Park, Knocklyon, Dublin 16Grant
2660019ATU Campus, Dublin Road, GalwayGrant
2660068Leckenagh, Burtonport, LetterkennyGrant
267013Ballycarrane, Patrickswell, Co. LimerickGrant
Showing 6 of 585,247 resultsView all →
Can I build a two-storey extension to the rear of a mid-terrace house in Drumcondra?
Searched 3 policies, 12 nearby precedents in Dublin City1.2s
A two-storey rear extension is possible but constrained by Policy QH28 and the development management standards for mid-terrace houses:
Policy QH28Extensions and Alterations to Dwellingsp. 189
Extensions should be subordinate to the main dwelling and respect the residential amenity of adjoining properties
Section 16.10.12Rear Extensions, Terracedp. 241
First floor rear extension limited to 3.5m depth. 22m minimum rear-to-rear separation distance must be maintained
Policy SC13Residential Amenityp. 132
Protect existing residential amenity including daylight, sunlight and overlooking
DCC/2023/3847Precedent, 42 Iona RoadGranted
Two-storey rear, mid-terrace, 280m away. 3.2m depth at first floor, granted with conditions
4 sources citedView evidence pack
Ask a planning question. Get a cited answer.
EirePlan's AI searches policies and precedents before answering. You see which documents it found, which sections it read, and the exact quotes behind each claim. No hallucinated policy references.
One workspace for every drawing, report, and consultant document.
Planning submissions involve files from multiple consultants. EirePlan keeps them in one project workspace with version history, approval pipeline, and planning stage tracking. No more "Final_v2_FINAL" file names.
This is not a general-purpose AI assistant.
A side-by-side look at generic tools versus a planning-native platform.
Generic
ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini
No project memory
Every conversation starts fresh with no context from previous work
Uncited answers
Responses lack references to source legislation or policy documents
No document control
Files scattered across folders with no version tracking
General knowledge
Broad information without Irish planning specificity
Planning-native
EirePlan
Persistent project context
All project history, documents, and decisions carry forward
Policy-referenced responses
Every answer includes citations to Irish planning law and policy
Versioned, approved documents
Audit trail with approval pipeline and role-based access
Irish planning law and practice
Grounded in development plans, legislation, and precedents